Do I correctly understand, that our opp. ânever fully embraced the ideals of Maidanâ?
And â I maybe donât understand â a mission of Opp. is giving a place for appearance of new public leaders. The Opp. hasnât got sufficient creativity and initiative to act. Then we need new leaders and public activity. Itâs very important that civil society itself begin to act.
But in the same time you said the Opp. must prevent real leaders from emerging?
How do you propose to prevent uncontrolled aggression, while we would have various groups that will do act independently? And how do you tell about the uprising of new actors, whereas Opp. should block the emergence of such actors?
And do you mean than pacific details are adequate âfor conducting a reboot of the governmentâ? It seems to me the Januk regime do not understand other argument except forces.
Finally excuse me but Alla is right. The Opp. plays an inhibitory game now â she blocks up new initiatives and all new organizations coming to Maidan. What make the âSvobodaâ when kicked young public organizations out from Kiev City State Administration? What when attacked other locations occupied by Spilâna sprava? Is it a friendly action to shoot at people who take up their residence here? Looks like the Opp. contrariwise fights with their competitors pressing them out of the Oppâs field.
I donât mean the Opp would support young public organizations but at least she could do not interfere! Otherwise it looks as only simple competition. The Opp could help for extraparliamentary organization, support them, vector them, without arranging internecine warfare.
They split Ukr. civ. society and opponents of regime up, more than all Russian activity. Without telling about a low level of Ukr. oppositionâs reputation on East and South, these clashes within the ârevolutionary campâ only push indecided men away of the Maidan. Donât you know about Yacenyuk the Bunny? =) the unity of protest splits up by such actionsâ¦
As to opposition and practical details.
Do I correctly understand, that our opp. ânever fully embraced the ideals of Maidanâ?
And â I maybe donât understand â a mission of Opp. is giving a place for appearance of new public leaders. The Opp. hasnât got sufficient creativity and initiative to act. Then we need new leaders and public activity. Itâs very important that civil society itself begin to act.
But in the same time you said the Opp. must prevent real leaders from emerging?
How do you propose to prevent uncontrolled aggression, while we would have various groups that will do act independently?
And how do you tell about the uprising of new actors, whereas Opp. should block the emergence of such actors?
And do you mean than pacific details are adequate âfor conducting a reboot of the governmentâ? It seems to me the Januk regime do not understand other argument except forces.
Finally excuse me but Alla is right. The Opp. plays an inhibitory game now â she blocks up new initiatives and all new organizations coming to Maidan. What make the âSvobodaâ when kicked young public organizations out from Kiev City State Administration? What when attacked other locations occupied by Spilâna sprava? Is it a friendly action to shoot at people who take up their residence here? Looks like the Opp. contrariwise fights with their competitors pressing them out of the Oppâs field.
I donât mean the Opp would support young public organizations but at least she could do not interfere! Otherwise it looks as only simple competition. The Opp could help for extraparliamentary organization, support them, vector them, without arranging internecine warfare.
They split Ukr. civ. society and opponents of regime up, more than all Russian activity. Without telling about a low level of Ukr. oppositionâs reputation on East and South, these clashes within the ârevolutionary campâ only push indecided men away of the Maidan. Donât you know about Yacenyuk the Bunny? =) the unity of protest splits up by such actionsâ¦