Don't worry about your mastery of English - the errors are minor. Firstly, let me clarify: US geopolitical interests don't care about the moral plane of "who deserves what"; it was my personal opinion. However, in this case, they are perfectly aligned. Had there not been an overwhelming public response, US would have decided that given Germany's position, US lack of leverage, and poor prospects for a revolutionary movement, it's better to make a deal with Russia without putting Budapest Memo under question. Morally, I didn't find anything wrong with such a stance for reasons stated. Further, point by point.
Than how do you answer: Ukrainian lived out 20 years yet and why they have so brutal exemplars? Such exemplars exactly are examples of totalitarian heritage!
Ukraine has not existed under a totalitarian regime since mid 1980s. You presume the exemplars here are brutality by Berkut and Titushki, however, they are poor examples of 'mass men' from the book. It is my understanding that most men in Berkut have families and titushki don't pose a significant threat unless Ukraine turns autocratic. My issue is with the passive majority, who are very much part of society but refuse to acknowledge it and act accordingly. Again, 55% of population is against Maidan.
we can(t) demand from a fish to be a bird, we must give her a time to sprout wings. Exactly, and you seem to argue there's a moral imperative in teaching the fish to fly. The truth is, you can't teach a fish to fly and with a bird, you don't need to.
Anyway, their actions were so weak and illogical as they wouldnât if anyone really want to seize power. Ultimately,, doesnât you said that Americans restrain Opp.? Don't confuse restraint with control. Opposition was prevented from escalating things or allowing a platform to anyone who would. They were not restrained from acting. Not all actions imply escalation. Their main problem is that they never fully embraced the ideals of Maidan and lack creativity and initiative to act effectively without escalating. It is perhaps fortunate that it turned out this way, as they are completely inadequate for conducting a reboot of the government. Whether intentionally or not, their real function is to allow a diplomatic solution and prevent real revolutionary leaders from emerging (at this point). I've explained previously why uncontrolled escalation would be a disaster. More importantly, opposition is not needed for people to self-organize. In fact, that's exactly what is going on, even if slowly, and will be a much more effective and resilient than what opposition could have created.
Re: Logical Questions
Ukraine has not existed under a totalitarian regime since mid 1980s. You presume the exemplars here are brutality by Berkut and Titushki, however, they are poor examples of 'mass men' from the book. It is my understanding that most men in Berkut have families and titushki don't pose a significant threat unless Ukraine turns autocratic. My issue is with the passive majority, who are very much part of society but refuse to acknowledge it and act accordingly. Again, 55% of population is against Maidan.
Exactly, and you seem to argue there's a moral imperative in teaching the fish to fly. The truth is, you can't teach a fish to fly and with a bird, you don't need to.
Don't confuse restraint with control. Opposition was prevented from escalating things or allowing a platform to anyone who would. They were not restrained from acting. Not all actions imply escalation. Their main problem is that they never fully embraced the ideals of Maidan and lack creativity and initiative to act effectively without escalating. It is perhaps fortunate that it turned out this way, as they are completely inadequate for conducting a reboot of the government. Whether intentionally or not, their real function is to allow a diplomatic solution and prevent real revolutionary leaders from emerging (at this point). I've explained previously why uncontrolled escalation would be a disaster. More importantly, opposition is not needed for people to self-organize. In fact, that's exactly what is going on, even if slowly, and will be a much more effective and resilient than what opposition could have created.